Movies: 18454 | TV Series: 3282 | Added today: 0 | Storage: 65882 GB
- Forgot password?
- | Register
- | Support
- | FAQ
- | Help
Download, Watch online No Strings Attached Movie.
| Genres: | ComedyRoma |
| Starring: | Cary Elwes, Ludacris, Olivia Thirlby, Lake Bell, Kevin Kline, Talia Balsam, Natalie Portman |
| Director(s): | Ivan Reitman |
| Available Quality: | DivX, Hi Def, iPod, Hi Def, Hi Def |
| Country: | USA |
| Year: | 2011 |
| IMDB Rating: | 6.2 |
A guy and girl try to keep their relationship strictly physical, but its not long before they learn that they want something more.
 |
No Strings Attached (iPod) | Resolution: 480x208 px | Total Size: 283 Mb |
|
|
 |
No Strings Attached (Hi Def) | Resolution: 852x352 px | Total Size: 581 Mb |
|
|
 |
No Strings Attached (Hi Def) | Resolution: 1920x800 px | Total Size: 7824 Mb |
|
|
 |
No Strings Attached (Hi Def) | Resolution: 1280x536 px | Total Size: 4471 Mb |
|
|
 |
No Strings Attached (DivX) | Resolution: 608x256 px | Total Size: 700 Mb |
|
Movie Photos: We have taken some photos of "No Strings Attached". They represent actual movie quality.
Visitor Reviews: (20)
Mandip Sembhi 17 May 2012
A Good Movie! Natalie Portman was GREAT!
OK... i was NOT expecting much from this movie but i was really WOW atthe end!!!Yes, the movie was alright for some but I LOVED IT!!! As a NataliePortman FAN, i was really worried about her doing a full-on Comedyrole... from her past films like Leon and the Star Wars movies (Herrole: Padme Amidala has a SAD ending...) Closer, V for Vendetta,Brothers... her roles from these movies were sad and sweet and herrecent film Black Swan - she was super-powerful and gave an OscarWinning role as Nina!!! I was so happy after watching No StringsAttached - Natalie Portman was super, super FUNNY - she did an amazingjob!!! There are scenes where Natalie Portman is over-the-top - but ithink she was great... the amount of ''BAD WORDS'' in the movie isWOW... loads of it!!!The movie overall was good - Ashton Kutcher was alright & funny.....did an OK/ good job! The side-actors were average and the soundtrackswere good...Anyways, No Strings Attached is a must-watch movie!My review: 7/10
johnstonjames 16 May 2012
Superficial, Shallow, Innocuous, Assessment Of Love And Relationships. But It's Kinda Cute And Not Without Some Merit.
i usually don't watch stuff like this. do chicks watch stuff like this?who watches stuff like this? i dunno but i'm in a relationship withsomeone who adores Ashton Kutcher, so to be nice i watched this. can'tsay i was real impressed except for the fact that it was a little morelikable than i expected it to be.normally i'd say i'm the wrong person to review a movie like this, it'sreally not my kind of thing, but i told myself that i would commitmyself to writing on every movie i watched no matter how old orinnocuous it may be. it's a therapy thing. but i'm at a loss for wordswhen things get this unimportant and superficial. here it goes.Ivan Reitman directed this? really. he's obviously getting old.'Stripes' is one of my favorite comedies of all time and i find it hardto fathom someone who directed a movie with such kick to it directed alight weight marshmallow like this.i tried hard to pay attention to the storyline at the expense of mybrain turning into mushy drivel. the pay off wasn't half bad. itactually had a little something to say and wasn't without a certainamount of self reflection. mostly i don't like the kind of people thatthis film was peopled with, but i tried not to be too judgmental. liveand let live i always say. sure these people were all smug, egomanicaljerks, but they seemed to be struggling a little with their existenceand seemed willing to ask some questions about themselves and things.that's all i've ever asked from people, show a little reflection andinsight into what you do and what motivates your behavior. i meanyou're not animals right? right? at least i hope not. mostly in reallife people practice very little self criticism or reflection aboutanything. most people are all action and no thought.this film was pretty typical of most Hollywood garbage. it makes sexlook easy and all you have to do is want to have sex and it shall come.whoa. my brains fall out just thinking about the silliness of thatnotion. it also, as usual, attempts to paint a cheery portrayal of gaylife. another stupid notion. yeah right. all gay people sit aroundwatching 'Glee' or lying on the floor having pseudo menstrual crampswith the girls. and no matter how overweight or homely you are you canalways score with a really cute guy easily. whoever wrote that crapmust either be straight or seriously deluded. STOP WITH THEWHITEWASHING Hollywood! it doesn't wash with a lot of us.also the rapper Ludicrous was a total joke here. does he really want toact so bad that he is willing to sell out and be the one token blackface in a film that is a sea of white faces. there really were littleor no black people in this film. not even the film extras. typicalHollywood. good to be conscious of your sexuality but not about yourracism. shame on Ivan Reitman.love and relationships are just about the most difficult thing you willdo in life. even casual sex probably doesn't come all that easily, buti wouldn't know anything about that.this movie makes having sex andlove look so easy. a deluded, silly and shallow notion of things. lovehurts whether it is right or wrong.at least the idiots that this movie was about attempted some reflectionon their mindlessly one track behavior. but the list of wrongs here isa little too long for my taste. especially when Natalie Portman's ugly"grenade" of a best girlfriend informs her that if she continues to bedepressed or a downer she will "seriously have to avoid her in thehallway". typical of current insensitivity which is so trendy andpopular. especially with ugly, fat, "grenade", ethnic girls. thatdidn't sound nice did it? well neither was the girl's behavior.Hollywood is pretty messed up. had to prove a point.as for Ashton and dumb little Natalie Portman? well neither one hasever impressed me much, but they are both likable enough presences anddid well to help tolerate this trivia. they can definitely act and areaffable enough to radiate a certain amount of warmth and sweetness. asa matter of fact Kutcher and Portman sum up the whole experience here,the film like the two actors, is kinda cute.
Saticoyllnolanb 12 May 2012
The 2 main characters are so good together, simple rom-com,,
Natalie Portman is such a CUTIE!!! And I mean I'm a dude but Ashton ispretty good looking in this they seem to go together perfectly!! Andcome on people, it's a romantic comedy, not the Godfather, what I'mgetting at is, you can't expect unique and totally new Stories from it.We just have to take it for what it is, a simple romantic comedy. Andthe simplicity is what makes it so good and what makes us go seeromantic comedies again and again. They're easy to watch and make usfeel good and allow us to put ourselves in the place of Ashton Kuthcer(that's what I did the whole movie!!!) or Natalie Portman. So in all,don't knock this movie because it lacks "originality", but insteadembrace it because it meets the criteria of a good romantic comedy:1.easy to watch 2.the main character get together in the end 3. A wellpaired couple (hot!) Ps. I know it's pretty weird that a guy likesromantic comedies like I do, but something about them I've alwaysliked. I don't know just my thing
12 May 2012
yeah it still hit the spot
It may be a lot of cliche and predictability, but so what... it was still a cute movie and totally hit the spot. Good job to all the actors and other folks because it was fun.
Shawn Brar 10 May 2012
This movie infuriated me.....I wanted to blow my brains out
What a dreadful movie to have to sit through on my day off. I watchedthis movie looking for something light and happy. Instead I was treatedto tale of guy that takes an emotional beat-down from a girl with someserious (non-rom-com) commitment issues. There was nothing romanticabout the relationship between these two and this movie and if anythingjust serves to reinforce some of the double standards that exist insociety. Ashton Kutcher's character taking her back at the end was notromantic, it was ridiculous and in real life relationships like thisfail! I'm not a macho guy myself, but anyone that has that difficult ofa time to commit is not worth the trouble. I felt sadness for Ashton'scharacter if anything. Two thumbs down! I would suggest a better use ofyour time!
preiss-buckner 09 May 2012
Dreadful.
As a man, I'll complain to an expected level every time about having towatch romantic comedies with my wife, but I can admit that I find mostof them fairly enjoyable in the end.Not so much with this one.This movie brought to mind two movies from the late '80s, not becauseof any similarity in content.The first was "Funny Farm." When Chevy Chase's wife reads the firstchapter of his manuscript, it's so bad that she actually cries beforeripping it to shreds in an honest critique.I don't know how this wasn't everyone's reaction to this script. It wasjust all over the place. The connection between Portman and Kutcher'scharacters is never close to believable, and the rest of the charactersadd nothing. Add in a ton of crudity presented with all the subtlety of"Beavis and Butt-Head" (and I say this as a big fan of that show, but Ithink this movie fancies itself as better than that), and it just leftme scratching my head. I'm not an expert on the process of makingfilms, but it seems like there are plenty of places along the way torecognize a real stinker. How was this movie ever made? The other movie that came to mind was "Steel Dawn," with PatrickSwayze. What the heck was Swayze doing in that movie, after "DirtyDancing"? The same goes with all the big names in this one. I noticedthat Natalie Portman was an executive producer, so she had to, I guess,but what is everyone else's excuse? What were Kutcher, Kline, and CaryElwes (in a non-existent role in which he was practicallyunrecognizable) thinking? Even Ludicrous (I know how his name is reallyspelled, but it's fixing it for me), who is still working to establishhimself as an actor, was too good for this one.There just wasn't a thing endearing about this film. I was shocked tocome here and see that so many people liked it. Maybe I just don't getit.The worst part? My wife keeps forgetting to take the disc back to RedBox, so we're still paying a buck a day to have it in our home. I needto call her right now.
rogerdarlington 07 May 2012
No "When Harry Met Sally"
In 1989, the classic rom-com "When Harry Met Sally" posed the questionof whether a guy and a gal could just be friends without sex getting inthe way. A little over two decades later, "No Strings Attached" askswhether they can just have sex without love taking over. Of course, weare now in the age when so many rom-coms are much more sexuallyexplicit and here we have an excessive number of references to bodyparts and sexual activity. Yet there is very little visual explicitnessand the only naked body on show is male.Diminutive (5' 3") Natalie Portman is obviously trying to do somethingtotally different from her intense role in "Black Swan" as Emma, adoctor with commitment issues, and, pretty though she is, this is not anatural role for her. Tall (6' 2") Ashton Kutcher is more at home asAdam, an aspiring television writer who is originally willing to goalong with the sex-only partnership. Like "When Harry Met Sally", "NoStrings Attached" is written by a woman (Elizabeth Meriwether) anddirected by a veteran of comedy films (Ivan Reitman) but it is not inthe same class, while still being moderately funny and engaging.
07 May 2012
a movie for high school boys
If you are a high school boy you might like this moive. Other than that it's a played out plot line that just makes adolescents think having sex means nothing. The movie takes about 45 minutes to even get into anything of substance.
hundredgoldstars 06 May 2012
Scooby Doo is Deeper Portman redefines flat
Whoa!!!! Wow! This was TRITE nonsense -- If you get the chance to seeit for free and you have two hours to kill -- GO DO SOMETHING ELSE!This was stinky bad. Just inane. Brain dead. Not even for teens -- tooinsipid for them. Whoa!!! Portman is even worse in this and how that ispossible I don't know -- Worse then she did in those other 5 films shejammed in before she knew she'd be taking time off for new human unit.This was just pure crap! Scooby Doo is deeper -- Portman needs to be ona sit com. She evokes a sort of shallow attitude on the screen butthat's it... It's like her inner monologue in whatever character she'splaying is "My trailer is too small. When will my vegan lunch arrive?!I want a knew dog walker. I've been sitting here for an hour and theyare not doing my scene. I want to leave. I am pretty and special. I amangry. Please don't pass on your gross air germs to me." ...And shewill toss in a nice mechanical smile, but it's still not enough to filla role in a movie. I think a little sit com show would serve her um...uh...um...range... better. Range being the space between these wordshere. See that space? Range being. I will play neurotic bitch orneurotic and tense. Oooohhh wow... Heyyy isn't that something.
06 May 2012
Not bad
This review is from: No Strings Attached (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo + Digital Copy) (Blu-ray) This was an ok movie. Kind of sappy and cheesy, not a bad date-night movie, but not Ashton Kutcher's best work. I'm stoked that I could get the Blu-Ray, DVD, and Digital combo, then again, this isn't a movie you'd want to watch on an ipod, not that great for solo viewing.
03 May 2012
"You fight like a miniature hamster"
I actually enjoyed this movie. I guess I have a thing for predictable romantic films. They all end the same. I loved the dialogue. I especially loved the character of the production assistant. Her personality was like OCD meets quirky. Natalie and Ashton did a good job on this. They meshed well together. I could have done without the father and ex-girlfriend. They were an unnecessary plot. 4 stars because ... well ... it's exactly like all the other romantic films out there. predictable. I would recommend this to anyone that has an open mind and doesn't mind knowing how the movie ends within the first 5 minutes.
lewiskendell 02 May 2012
Decent enough.
Not bad. No Strings Attached gets off to a rocky start with a string ofunfunny jokes and a forced premise. But thankfully, the movieeventually falls into an entertaining, if entirely conventional,groove. Kutcher plays his usual heart of gold, sensitive, funny guy, which Ican take or leave. But Portman kills it with a sense of humor andbeauty that reminds me a lot of Mila Kunis. Don't get too excited at that R rating, this isn't a raunchy sexcomedy, despite the premise. It's most assuredly a romantic comedy. I doubt No Strings Attached will be anyone's movie of the year, butit's certainly not as bad as the first 15 minutes had me worried thatit would be. Check it out if you're interestedÂ
29 April 2012
Enjoyable
This is an enjoyable and entertaining movie that will make you feel good after watching it. Pretty people, good acting and a nice story for an easy, relaxing almost two hours viewing.
29 April 2012
Seinfeld Said It Better In A Half Hour
This review is from: No Strings Attached (DVD) Sex without love is an impossible task? Some ladies of the evening may disagree. This isn't a bad movie just a totally predictable one. For the first two-thirds of the film it seems like it's nothing but a bunch of self-absorbed yuppies yammering about their delusional opinions on love and sex. Ashton Kutcher's randy dad played by Kevin Kline was the only thing making the enterprise palatable. It's only in the last third that the film redeems itself when it reaches the inevitable conclusion that yes, love between two people is a possibility. They released this film over Valentine's Day Weekend and I guess it would be a servicable date movie though those offended by rough and frank language might look elsewhere. Otherwise, it's pretty forgettable. Natalie, you won an Oscar! What are you doing in ho-hum fare like this?
28 April 2012
bad writing
This review is from: No Strings Attached (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo + Digital Copy) (Blu-ray) This movie was a waste of time. First of all, I think Natalie Portman did a crappy job of acting in this...but it may not have been all her fault, since the writing was crappy too. It was totally unbelievable and at the same time totally predictable. I think it could have been a great story if it had a more gradual middle script...I just think it unbelievalbe for Natalie's charactor to change that much. I wouldn't recommend this to anyone....
emilyc1351 27 April 2012
Disgusting
While going into this movie I knew that it wasn't going to be great, asmost of these types of movies are never great. However, as most moviessuch as this, I figured I'd get a few laughs in and perhaps a feelingof giddiness. Well, that didn't happen. The movie started off raunchy,and awkward and for the most part it continued this way. Toward themiddle of the movie I was just completely disgusted by the jokes andwas just waiting for it to end. The movie was just all wrong. I shouldhave probably known that it was going to be this way, because it seemsas when an actor/actress wins an Oscar the next movie they are in iscompletely a miss.
Paul Haakonsen 26 April 2012
There was something missing...
This is basically your typical run-of-the-mill romantic comedies. Thereis nothing innovating or new to be seen or experienced throughout thecourse of this movie, and that makes the movie experience less thanadequate.The story in "No Strings Attached" is as oh-so-many other romanticcomedies; a guy and a girl from two very different aspects of life cometogether and find love. But of course, the budding love is not to behad that easily, they have to overcome the obstacle between them andtrue bliss. Sounds familiar? Yeah, it does, doesn't it?As for the acting in the movie, then they had managed to put together agood enough ensemble of people. However, there wasn't really muchworking chemistry between Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher on thescreen, and it didn't work all that well in favor of the movie. It wasa shame that Cary Elwes only had such a small role in the movie, and Iwould have liked to seen more of Kevin Kline.This movie may be well worth your time if you are a big fan of these"off the assembly line" romantic comedies. But, personally, then I wasa bit bored and not thoroughly entertained with the movie. There arefar better romantic comedies available. And as for being a comedy? Wellthe movie failed to make me laugh even a single time.
napierslogs 25 April 2012
No romance, comedy or even friendship - what kind of romantic comedy is that?
"No Strings Attached", friends with benefits, and as they described itto their friends and family, they're friends who have sex. First thereare the obvious jokes, "Nope. That's not possible!" But my problem withthat set-up is that these charactersÂif they are even charactersÂaredefinitely not friends. "Acquaintances who have sex." Really takes awaysome of the potential, doesn't it? We're already told that they're taking the romance out of a romanticcomedy, but minus the amiability that comes with friendship, thenthey're also taking the comedy out of a romantic comedy. So what are weleft with? A juvenile story, best friends who have a meaninglesssub-plot, and sex. That's it. I like romantic comedies but they tookout everything that I like about them and left me with everything thatI don't like about them.It's vulgar as they promised but with no greater purpose and for nohigher comedy. If you're going to give me sex humour, there has to bemore to it. Not one-dimensional characters who have no resemblances toactual human beings. For as charming and attractive as Ashton Kutcherand Natalie Portman are, if there are no feelings attached, then whyshould I care? Paramount Pictures, this was just plain wrong.Follow my blog Napierslogs' Movie Expositions athttp://napierslogs.blogspot.com
Nick Damian 25 April 2012
Boring and stupid and rude
I gave it a 2.This simply sucks for a movie.It drags on far too long and the dialogue and characters are dull asbeans.Ashton sucks as a lead and the story doesn't help.Totally unrealistic.Totally uninteresting and a waste of my download on netflix.I'm glad that this came as a monthly package in my bill and that Ididn't have to actually pay for this.How I long for real plots and stories that actually entertain.
24 April 2012
Had Its Moments, But Kutcher and Portman Never Quite Gelled
I like both Natalie Portman and Ashton Kutcher but they have very different strengths - his is comedy and hers is drama - and that really showed in this movie. They never seemed quite in synch or both comfortable at once. Kutcher was better in the first half, when they were in their 'no strings attached' sex phase, and the movie was standard semi-raunchy rom-com fare. Portman was better in the second half, when they broke up, and had to do some soul-searching to decide what they wanted from each other. The writing was just so-so, as were the requisite surrounding comedy-relief 'friends.' So overall, an OK watch, but not great.