Movies: 18470 | TV Series: 3282 | Added today: 0 | Storage: 65898 GB

| Genres: | ActionThrillerAdvent |
| Starring: | Kane Hodder, Simon Rhee, Steven Williams, Keith Allen, Gerald Webb, Xin Sarith Wuku, Carl Ciarfalio |
| Director(s): | Cole S. McKay |
| Available Quality: | Hi Def, Hi Def |
| Country: | USA |
| Year: | 2011 |
| IMDB Rating: | 2.2 |
Alexandra DArtagnan, junior member of NSA uncovers a conspiracy that the goal is to assassinate the American president. Alexandra has secured the support of three famous and notorious international spies in order to stop the assassination.
Visitor Reviews: (6)mikemdp 06 May 2012
This film by low-budget direct-to-DVD house The Asylum is a mixed bagof silly, comic book action, uneven visual effects and even more unevenacting. The end result is ultimately a fun, if not altogethersatisfying, time waster.It's not a straight mockbuster of any "Three Musketeers" movie inAsylum's usual "Transmorphers" kind of way. Except for the title andsome character names from the Dumas novel, the movie better resembles a"Charlie's Angels" film, as its plot centers around a team of actionheroes attempting to stop a conspiracy to incite World War III.The team code-named "Musketeers" consists of, predictably, spies whoseown code names are Athos, Porthos and Aramis. They're joined later byan exotic-looking female spy named D'Artagnan who claims to be a directdescendant of the real one. Their enemy: A guy code-named "TheCardinal" (natch) who for reasons unclear wants to start a global warby killing the president.The actors in the Musketeer roles are not too bad and actually appearto be having some fun, which is rare for The Asylum. Arguably the twosorest points in most Asylum productions is that their preposterous,low-budget movies are presented dead seriously, and that their has-beenactors like Greg Evigan seem mortified to be appearing in them.Not so here, where martial artist XIN is so charismatic as Athos you'llhope to see him in a better kung fu movie, lovely Michele Boyd asAramis is reminiscent of Meg Ryan circa "Innerspace," Keith Allanchannels Jeff Goldblum as brainy Porthos who spouts '80s pop culturereferences like "The light is green, the trap is clean," and HeatherHemmens (of the CW's "Hellcats") actually makes you believe a CostaRican hottie could be the direct descendant of a 17th Century Frenchguard.But again, as with most Asylum movies, other cast members are so badyou'll wonder who on the production team they must be related to/havepaid off/had sexual relations with to land their roles. Alan Rachins isso flat-out awful as the Cardinal he comes off as someone's old collegeacting teacher given the part as a favor. He pulls down every scenehe's in so badly the movie actually appears to freeze-frame every timehe comes on screen. Where's Barry Bostwick when you need him? Digitaleffects by Tiny Juggernaut are typically bargain basement, but not somuch that they ruin the show. This is, after all, comic book melodrama,so it's OK by me if the jet planes and rockets look a little cartoony.It's mindless fun that's worth a look on Netflix or maybe picked upused for a couple of bucks. Paying any more for it would be a biggercrime than World War III.
guestar57 05 May 2012
Starring: Alan Rachins, David Chokachi and Kane Hodder.Directed by: Cole McKay Pretty amazing effort to entertain with afamiliar name in action-adventure films.The action stuff is truly breathtaking and moves really fast to plotpoints that make sense and add to excitement of effort.The character names you are used to are here and the evil Cardinal isrepresented by LA LAW 's Alan Rachins.The evilness continues with David Chokachi from BAYWATCH fame and heshows many skills that can still be added to his acting efforts.The cameos reach a pinnacle with F13 JASON,Kane Hodder gives a fleetingcharacter some horrible glee in his tasks.This should be a big hit in rentals and sales, It has everything forthe fan and even occasional viewer of Redbox or Netflix fodder.
gavinpwebb 05 May 2012
I have never been so motivated to write a negative film review before.This movie has, as far as I can see, no redeeming features whatsoever.The plot is mediocre and unoriginal. The script is clichéd, unrealisticand uninspiring. It seems to be a low budget movie, but has a storywith action sequences that need far better special effects, or lessambition. The acting seems terrible, but with that script and the lowproduction values, anyone would have looked bad and I can't fault theactors for anything other than bad judgment for accepting the job.One thing that stood out above all else for me was the poor quality ofsome of the action sequences. The (mercifully) short sword fightbetween two of the leading ladies was probably the worst fight I haveever seen on screen. For a director who has made a career as a stuntmanand a fight choreographer, this is really puzzling. What happened? Inone of the final scenes two supposedly expert fencers have a fightwhere they hack at each other with foils as if they're holdingmachetes. For a film that takes it's name from such a classic story ofsword fighting excellence, this failure is an insult, and unforgivable.I was warned before watching this that it was bad, so I had exceedinglylow expectations. Even so, they were not met.
tom-bartsch-255-454775 05 May 2012
This movie was somewhat amusing. If you don't expect intelligentdialogs, awesome special effects and top-class actors you can watchthis movie. Switch-off your brain and watch.The story is a typical good and bad thing without surprises. There aresome would-be hackers with very unrealistic hacking methods, somewould-be fighters, boring fighting scenes and a lot of low-levelspecial effects at which I have to say that I have seen worse effectsin other movies.I really liked the charisma of Alexandra D'Artangan (Heather Hemmens)and Isaac Athos (Xin Sarith Wuku). But most of the actors arecompletely lacking in acting performance. The bad guy Treville theCardinal (Alan Rachins) is an inflexible old guy and simply notcredible as a bad guy from my opinion.The camera work is awful. Too much switching (close, distant, close,distant...).All things considered the involved parties tried hard too make a moviewith good effects but unfortunately they didn't managed it.
eneguepogi 01 May 2012
I never imagined getting frustrated watching a movie so patheticallymade. I'm not sure what the producers are thinking using 3 musketeersas a title. they made a mockery on the original in order to gain a hypeto watch this movie. I'm completely disgusted! if anyone is planning tosee this movie, please spare your misery and don't watch this as thismight just ruin your day. I suggest go out and have time with yourfamily instead. All in all Fast forward button was my friend watchingthis movie. All in all I rate this movie 2 of 10. If you are to watchthis movie, don't get your hopes high as you will definitely just wasteyour time.
syzygy-208-879849 30 April 2012
When the movie started I thought it might be worth a look. But 10minutes into it I realized this was a new new level of bad theater. The premise was hokey and the director was in love with a style ofcinematographic where the shot pops to a zoom in. It was constant andannoying.The moment I know this was the worst movie I seen this year was whenthey turned on the oven of an electric stove to blow up a house. Thiswas the typical attention to detail the cast and director gave thismovie. I saw no less than 6 sequences that were ripped off from othermovies. And terribly reproduced as well. Save your money and the hour and a half of your lives and skip seeingthis film, unless you want to see how not to film and action movie.